THE USA LAW OF CITIZENS TO BECOME A GENERAL ATTORNEY RIGHT.
2009-12-07 22:48
I just attempted to post this at freerepublic. com :
There is nothing "amiss" at 18 U.S.C. 1964:
it authorizes Private Citizens to perform duties
as Private Attorneys General. See these cases:
http://www.supremel aw.org/decs/ agency/private. attorney. general.htm
The database of missing credentials is here:
http://www.supremel aw.org/rsrc/ commissions/ index.htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/rsrc/ commissions/ evidence. folders.2004- 03-16.htm
See answers from DOJ to proper FOIA Requests for
credentials of which DOJ is the legal custodian.
The criminal statute at 18 U.S.C. 4 creates a
legal obligation to report Federal FELONIES
to an officer in the civil or military authority
of the U.S. Government: hence, the Mail Fraud
Report and VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS,
ON INFORMATION.
http://www4. law.cornell. edu/uscode/ 18/4.html
If I had not complied with this statute,
then I would be a felon, and I have no
intentions of violating 18 U.S.C. 4.
Some of you should think twice about exposing
your ignorance here. Permit me to recommend
that you ask questions first, and then you can
make up your own mind about the correctness
of any answers you receive.
There is a maxim in litigation holding that
Ad Hominem argumentation is THE LOWEST form
of argumentation that exists.
In contrast, arguing to the law, or the facts,
is necessarily a "higher" form of argumentation,
e.g. there are 2 classes of citizens in America,
not one class:
http://www.supremel aw.org/rsrc/ twoclass. htm
The class of Citizens contemplated by the
Qualifications Clauses refers to State Citizens,
not federal citizens:
http://www.supremel aw.org/authors/ mitchell/ quals.htm
Federal citizens were not even contemplated
when the organic (organizing) U.S. Constitution
was first being drafted:
http://www.supremel aw.org/rsrc/ twoclass. htm#pannill
The term "United States" in the Qualifications Clauses
means "States united". People v. De La Guerra
http://www.supremel aw.org/cc/ gilberts/ swornaff. htm#delaguerra
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A.,M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www4. law.cornell. edu/uscode/ 18/1964.html
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremel aw.org/decs/ agency/private. attorney. general.htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/index. htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/support. policy.htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/guideline s.htm
http://congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/
There is nothing "amiss" at 18 U.S.C. 1964:
it authorizes Private Citizens to perform duties
as Private Attorneys General. See these cases:
http://www.supremel aw.org/decs/ agency/private. attorney. general.htm
The database of missing credentials is here:
http://www.supremel aw.org/rsrc/ commissions/ index.htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/rsrc/ commissions/ evidence. folders.2004- 03-16.htm
See answers from DOJ to proper FOIA Requests for
credentials of which DOJ is the legal custodian.
The criminal statute at 18 U.S.C. 4 creates a
legal obligation to report Federal FELONIES
to an officer in the civil or military authority
of the U.S. Government: hence, the Mail Fraud
Report and VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS,
ON INFORMATION.
http://www4. law.cornell. edu/uscode/ 18/4.html
If I had not complied with this statute,
then I would be a felon, and I have no
intentions of violating 18 U.S.C. 4.
Some of you should think twice about exposing
your ignorance here. Permit me to recommend
that you ask questions first, and then you can
make up your own mind about the correctness
of any answers you receive.
There is a maxim in litigation holding that
Ad Hominem argumentation is THE LOWEST form
of argumentation that exists.
In contrast, arguing to the law, or the facts,
is necessarily a "higher" form of argumentation,
e.g. there are 2 classes of citizens in America,
not one class:
http://www.supremel aw.org/rsrc/ twoclass. htm
The class of Citizens contemplated by the
Qualifications Clauses refers to State Citizens,
not federal citizens:
http://www.supremel aw.org/authors/ mitchell/ quals.htm
Federal citizens were not even contemplated
when the organic (organizing) U.S. Constitution
was first being drafted:
http://www.supremel aw.org/rsrc/ twoclass. htm#pannill
The term "United States" in the Qualifications Clauses
means "States united". People v. De La Guerra
http://www.supremel aw.org/cc/ gilberts/ swornaff. htm#delaguerra
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A.,M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964
http://www4. law.cornell. edu/uscode/ 18/1964.html
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:15 PM, <Dansmith1954@ aol.com> wrote:
-- Hi Paul, I noticed this on free republic...I do not know who"upcountry miss" is......
Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and
Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)
http://www.supremel aw.org/decs/ agency/private. attorney. general.htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/index. htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/support. policy.htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/guideline s.htm
http://congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/
by a good cause.
to your groups.
Dear Freedom Fighter. In USA with the excellent Whistleblowers Intelligence and crime Probes us can do the Activist Civil Organization New World Order Government Crimes Legal Prosecution and Punishment, with all Law weight over us chosen General Attorney to do the Justice achievements in America for us rights defense!